<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows Debuts. So What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-debuts-so-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-debuts-so-what/</link>
	<description>Snarking the Web since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#160; The Real Deal With Safari&#8217;s Font Rendering&#160;by&#160;Gadzooki</title>
		<link>http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-debuts-so-what/comment-page-1/#comment-19407</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; The Real Deal With Safari&#8217;s Font Rendering&#160;by&#160;Gadzooki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-debuts-so-what/#comment-19407</guid>
		<description>[...] At any rate, much has been said about the high points and low points of Safari, particularly the Windows port. Ia recently reviewed it here, and gave it a dismal 0.5 rating (meaning it&#8217;s more or less neutral, leaning a bit to the positive side). There have been a lot more reviews on the blogosphere, but here&#8217;s one thing in common that I see: Windows users are very bothered by the on-screen font rendering. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At any rate, much has been said about the high points and low points of Safari, particularly the Windows port. Ia recently reviewed it here, and gave it a dismal 0.5 rating (meaning it&#8217;s more or less neutral, leaning a bit to the positive side). There have been a lot more reviews on the blogosphere, but here&#8217;s one thing in common that I see: Windows users are very bothered by the on-screen font rendering. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
