Comments on: Is Problogging Sustainable? http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/ Snarking the Web since 2004. Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Hello people http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-61379 Hello people Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:52:06 +0000 http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/#comment-61379 Thanks boys11812870d889c3fe19ebdf4578b9c323 Thanks boys11812870d889c3fe19ebdf4578b9c323

]]> By: http://homepage.mac.com/fmp3musicdownloads/music-downloads-pc.htm http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-47422 http://homepage.mac.com/fmp3musicdownloads/music-downloads-pc.htm Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:19:02 +0000 http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/#comment-47422 Hi, my sites:32dc894bee218ce96c9225c2c831f5c2 Hi, my sites:32dc894bee218ce96c9225c2c831f5c2

]]> By: jangelo http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-10234 jangelo Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:15:59 +0000 http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/#comment-10234 Hi Yaro. I understand the difference. I actually stated it as content + traffic = money because I believe you cannot have a good income stream without either content or traffic. In some cases, though content can bring you money (i.e., with career/network problogging), and raw traffic only even without much relevant content will bring you money (i.e., aggregation). But it's a combination of the two that's the best, IMHO. Perhaps a better way to state it is content -> traffic -> money Cheers. Hi Yaro. I understand the difference. I actually stated it as content + traffic = money because I believe you cannot have a good income stream without either content or traffic. In some cases, though content can bring you money (i.e., with career/network problogging), and raw traffic only even without much relevant content will bring you money (i.e., aggregation). But it’s a combination of the two that’s the best, IMHO.

Perhaps a better way to state it is

content -> traffic -> money

Cheers.

]]> By: Yaro http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-10217 Yaro Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:10:27 +0000 http://www.jackofallblogs.com/2007/01/18/is-problogging-sustainable/#comment-10217 Hi Jangelo, Thanks for the write-up on my articles. I have at least two more in the series yet to come as well. By the way I explain my formula content = traffic = money because it's the content that brings in the traffic and the traffic the converts into money. Content isn't added to traffic specifically, it is a cause and effect relationship - but I can see where you are coming from as well with your version of the formula. Cheers, Yaro Hi Jangelo,

Thanks for the write-up on my articles. I have at least two more in the series yet to come as well.

By the way I explain my formula content = traffic = money because it’s the content that brings in the traffic and the traffic the converts into money. Content isn’t added to traffic specifically, it is a cause and effect relationship – but I can see where you are coming from as well with your version of the formula.

Cheers,

Yaro

]]>