I love Eddie Sowden
It’s the little people who have brains. Another wondermus tip from the readers of JOAB. In regards to the purge,crusade,and religious jihad by 9rules.com
You say that the network wants to be one where “sexually explicit content doesn’t exist?. Who far will this line go though? Is it ok for you to link to sites containing content?(http://9rules.com/whitespace/horizontal_dance.php) is it ok for you to be part of a network where a sister site contains content?I think you need to be a bit more explicit as to where you are going to draw the line with these two new rules. And I also think the way I can get myself from here to sexerati, only by clicking links needs to be reviewed. Whether ‘Work Boxers’ is removed from the network or it removes its association with the ‘Fine Fools Network’ something needs to happen.
via 9rules
Hmm, I am not to sure if I like my comment being reproduced in this fashion.
Before people start taking shots at me I would like to clear something up. I have read every comment in the post on Not Too Geek. I have read the account on why Personified was removed from the network from his blog (This was written as a result of that). I have respect for 9rules and the way they have gone about dealing with all the crap that has been thrown at them. I have tried to look in to all the facts before taking a side on the matter. This comment was not made as a personal attack at anyone more of a general view on how things look from my side. I have never read this site before (not my cup of tea) and my comment being published here does not mean I share the view of the site.
Eddie Sowden said this on February 16, 2006 8:43 am
Yes sir Eddie I know you don’t agree with me and its probably not your cup o tea. That’s fine. Let me make some small changes.
Cowboy said this on February 16, 2006 9:07 am
Let me know if that is better and if anyone is stupid enough to take a shot at you their idiots.
Cowboy said this on February 16, 2006 9:12 am
Eddie, it was clear from your comments over at NTG that you proceeded through the details of this issue very judiciously. The balanced, thoughtful nature of your statements made them stand out among the “noise” that filled the room at Tyme’s site, and although I didn’t write this post, I’m assuming that’s why they were represented here.
I think you raised some very valid, very pertinent questions – certainly ones that any good journalist would want answered regarding this 9rules fiasco. We appreciate your insight, and if you are offended by the inclusion here, simply say the word – we’ll remove the reference with no questions asked.
The Deuce said this on February 16, 2006 9:40 am
I know I have raised some good points and if you look over at the 9rules post they are now being very good politicians and avoiding all of the questions. I doubt they will ever get answerd though.
Thank you for removing the first part of my comment, the rest of it is only asking questions and stating facts that do need answering. So I am fine with that being left here. I meant no offense by saying that I do not share the views of the site. It is just you seem to have to cover your back nowadays, people are very quick to prejudge.
Eddie Sowden said this on February 16, 2006 9:58 am
Is 9Rules really that important that you must post on them every day?
Andy Hagans said this on February 16, 2006 10:38 am
Its not every day Andy just like twice in a month man they just happen to run back to back. Sorry mate.
Cowboy said this on February 16, 2006 11:30 am